Categories
Fashion Editorials

A Fashion Editorial: One Man’s Treasure…

While we were online last night, looking at the latest fashion shows and collections, something caught our eye, and this time is wasn’t the clothes or the accessories.

While we were on Lacoste’s official Facebook page, we could not help to read the comments of the people who has seen the pictures of their fall-winter 2013-2014 collection. We usually think it’s highly important to read what people have to say, because we love conversation and believe that this is the way to see what works and what doesn’t, and therefore improve everything.

Usually fashion shows of the big fashion designers and houses from around the world receive very positive feedback from the audience, but this Lacoste collection didn’t do so well. The album on their page was a mix between men’s and women’s clothes, but the reactions were similar. Someone said: ” Another person commented on a creation: “what the hell”, as the same creation was appreciated by another Facebook user as “this is disgusting”. Other comments on the collection were “what a shame”; “yuck”.

But not everyone agreed, some people appreciated the collection and thought it to be really good! One piece was commented by two users: one said: “garbage bag” while another commented: “awsm concept”. So, which one is it?

It’s interesting to see how high fashion, so to speak, does not get appreciation as much as used to. We are wondering; is it really bad or is it just misunderstood? We also agreed that some of the outfits would have never seen the runway if they were not backed up by Lacoste, while others very extremely sophisticated and would have had the same value in any environment.

 

Photographer Ansel Adams said: No man has the right to dictate what other men should perceive, create or produce, but all should be encouraged to reveal themselves (…)” and this is the spirit we love to encourage as well!

This said, we notice that a lot of people don’t actually define what they like and what they don’t in a conceptual way. One of our purposes is to let people discover a sense of fashion and to let a new culture of clothes rise. Looking at art history, we can notice that the things that were controversial at their time were the ones that pushed to boundaries of culture and made society take a step further. It is premature to say whether the Lacoste collection did that, but it’s not premature to notice that the reaction of the common Facebook user says something about our culture. We notice all around the art world a high rupture between the creators of works that posses cognitive properties and the way they are received. Lacoste incorporates all their knowledge into this collection and tried to make some state of the art clothes, using fine lines and a well-thought fabric-color balance, but it was not perceived as such by many people.

 

Fashion today, like most arts or means of expression, is torn between the old vision of the art and the practical craft from which the art piece has evolved. Should fashion be something that is worn and only then a complete artistic act, or is it an expression of a creator’s vision which needs to be admired?

So, what did you think of the collection? What do you think, is one man’s garbage another man’s treasure? How do you establish your standard of a well-done thing? Continue the conversation in the comments space below, on our Facebook or Twitter!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fraquoh and Franchomme

 

 

 

 

 

P.S. We know fashion is not always great, this is why we created a post called: 11 weirdest  looks on the runway, where fashion got really weird!

42 replies on “A Fashion Editorial: One Man’s Treasure…”

I personally do not care for this collection. It also happens that I couldn’t care less about what Lacoste sends down the runway because they are a one-trick-pony whose specialty is preppy sportswear. Also the “gorilla arms” trend was a trend of interest during last years NYFW Fall 2012 shows that did not translate into ready-to-wear. Plus, the use of color-blocking is just useless to the balance and aesthetics of the looks. I would be pressed to call this “disgusting” because the leather zipped dresses (not pictured above) in the collection were quite elegant. In general, I think high fashion is GREATLY misunderstood by the massive market. In many cases, designers want to present a collection as a piece of artwork, not something that they expect will be embraced by the masses. What makes fashion so interesting to follow is the fact that some designer fill the niche of producing clothes that will appeal to the majority of consumers while others challenge all our preconceived notions of clothing, Marc Jacobs for example. I probably wouldn’t look to facebook users for a Fashion critique in many cases. Great post, and a worthy topic for discussion!

We think that many arts today need to invent new terms for their new means of expression: we see this rupture in cinema, painting and photography and now in fashion. Is fashion something to be worn, or is it just a statement, better said a mirror-statement of the creator.

Very boxy and undefined however we must remember the runway doesn’t always translate to real way. Most of what we see is a bit over the top to draw attention and not sold in the stores. Lacoste didn’t venture too far off their color schemes and style mode.

hey,
you got a very interesting point there my friend. i am designer my self and it won’t be wrong to say that fashion concepts are subjective and based on individual perception. personally, i quite liked Lacoste collection but i am not surprised that other din’t appreciate it. Concept fashion is similar to art, reception is uncertain and they take time to trickle down.

well…i work for a retail brand… that make totally commercial garments. But i have my couture bag venture which has high concept quotient products. I do get mixed reactions but positive reaction s are more. I guess people don’t readily accept conceptual garments, the way they do products. Maybe, i can sometime show you my collection and you can review it.. 🙂

I think high fashion is basically walking modern art. There are people who will “get” certain pieces and people who won’t. Being more into casual highstreet clothing, I know that a lot of things I see on the runway I would never actually wear, but I can usually see the beauty in them in an artistic way. However, I’m not very inspired by this collection, it just seems dull to me.

I don´t know what to say yet. Not sure if I like the neck area. Personally I don´t think I would wear this collection. So perhaps that is the answer, that this collection is not for me 😉

Hello,
I loved the collection I found it very interesting and different. The idea of the menswear is really well brought here, well, of course we find different shapes and maybe people don’t find it very sexy and attractive but I think that overall they tried to make it masculine, sportswear but at the same time have a feminine side it’s a different approach and I respect that.
I think that designers have their market and if Lacoste presented this collection, they probably know that somewhere someone would buy it.
Fashion is hard to understand and I think that the ones who criticize are those who don’t get it. It seems easier to say “I don’t like it” instead f trying to understand what was the idea.
It’s all about someone’s vision, someone’s way of seing things, and I think that we should respect that even if we don’t like what they do.

I quite like the collection. I think it’s interesting, thoughtful, inspiring. I really like the colour combos and shapes of the clothes. I may not wear them, but that doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate the beauty in them.

A lot of the time fashion on runway is misunderstood to be ready to wear. Some of it is, sure, but most of it is meant to show an extreme to make it perfectly clear what’s up this season. Sometimes extreme gets a little ugly. Like that garbage bag. 😀

As a designer myself, I know that when you are producing a runway show, you sometimes create pieces that make the impact for the show. You may not sell many of those pieces, or even create them beyond the show, but those are the pieces that grab the attention and they are worked in with the things that would work or be sold after the show. This particular show is a little bit edgier than what I’m used to seeing for Lacoste, but I wouldn’t say it’s horrible. The majority of the pieces can translate into the streets, you just have to have the style and attitude to pull it off. Love the color combos and the interesting shapes. I took some time to check out the lookbook and the runway show and even though there are some pieces that most of the public would not even think of wearing, there is always someone who will see it and know that they can’t live without it. One man’s trash is another man’s treasure.

I actually think that the first one for men is nice but the rest of the collection for women aren’t very wearable in my opinion. I don’t think many people can pull it off on the streets, or want to anyway. It’s creative but it only belongs in the runway.

In my humble opinion, I think it’s tacky and awful… I believe that the people who liked it on facebook or anywhere don’t pay attention to the details, they just put a “like” and that’s it!
I don’t see any design or any efforts to make a great collection, the shoulders, the skirts are completely out of shape.

Silvana

http://www.silvanacasalins.blogspot.com

I think the collection is very artistic and definitely could do well as an exhibit of some sort but it’s not quite at the level where McQueen was if that makes any sense? Alexander McQueen could bring something totally abstract and unbelievable to the table and it was fashion and it was wearable. This is very much art but not so much practical in any sense. So I’ll let you decide which team I’m on! Hehe! I do like it I just don’t know if it’s necessarily fashion…

Your Comment and Input

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.